Opa1612 vs opa2134

Opa1612 vs opa2134. • Excellent sound quality • Ultra-low distortion: 0. 我想升级音频放大器 opa2134、ti 网站再次命令我更改新的 opa。 我发现 opa1612是 soundplus 终极产品系列中的一款产品、这就是我对它进行更改的原因。 遗憾的是、对于新的 opa1612、我在输出通道上获得了大量噪声。 我尝试使用 ne5532p 等低成本组件、无噪声、opa2134无 Jul 6, 2024 · 比較したのは高音質のもの限定で厳選した電圧帰還icのlme49990、opa627、muses8920、opa1612（opa211）等ですが、これらよりも圧倒的に良いです。音はths4631の印象と近いのですがths4631側の安定性の問題（発振していると音質が劣化する）で同じ条件で直接比較でき Nov 19, 2014 · opa1612 与 . Desktop: S-Audio Focus 2 + NiNO Final Carbon Mk3. For gain: OPA209 but only against NE5534 and V6V singles. Do you know why i obtained this issue with the new The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. Sep 14, 2021 · Of the op amps in my collection the massive misbehavers are the OPA1656, the LME49990 and the OPA1612. OPA2134 is more stable, as it is not too fast for Audio. But $40-57 each Careful swapping in a higher bandwidth part, they can oscillate in "old" circuit designs and not all parts are unity-gain stable. VIN(DIFF) Differential input voltage ±VS V IO Output short-circuit(3) Continuous TA Operating temperature –55 125 °C TJ Junction temperature –65 150 °C Tstg Storage temperature –65 150 °C (1) JEDEC document JEP155 states that 500-V HBM allows safe manufacturing with a standard ESD control process. 00008% • Low noise: 8nV/√Hz • True FET-input: IB= 5pA • High speed: – Slew rate: 20V/µs – Bandwidth: 8MHz • High open-loop gain: 120dB (2kΩ) • Wide supply range: ±2. Hi there probaly a simple question maybe not. The OPA1611 and OPA1612 offer rail-to-rail output swing to within 600 mV with a 2-kΩ load, which increases headroom and maximizes dynamic range. However, I remember that the chip was about 3 times worse vs opa1612 regarding noise in I/U stage and even more noisy than opa1602 which draws 3x times less current. 1 Portable: AK100-II + Dita Truth. Feb 11, 2021 · According to the TI datasheets OPA1612 has less noise than OPA1656. I try to use a cheap component like NE5532P, no noise, with OPA2134 no noise with the OPA1612 a lot of noise. But now I have to replace them. Out of all four of these, the V5i-D has the best build quality. Joined 2011. Aug 24, 2012 · xslavic. Opa2134 is a very good opamp. 2013-06-30 1:38 pm. I would say it depends on what circuit. I love it. Oct 8, 2017 · So I just blew up 5 Burr Brown OPA2134 due to bad labelling on the PCB (Ok I was also supposed to be more careful). 1-nV/√ Hz noise density with an ultralow distortion of 0. The Muses 02 is just gorgeous, warm and sexy. This may be the case with low frequency filters. MUSES8820 is the best, IMHO. The clear winners for me are the 2227/8 but I think the 8 has a slight edge in high end possibly? Yeah. Now all the folks are using opa2134 op -amps as the replacement. It is more open sounding and clearer sound from OPA1612 then OPA2134. But that does not say anything about the SQ. I just thought using two opa627, i will achieve 2134's audio quality. +Gain Bandwidth. 4" plug). 9 nV/√Hz at 10 kHz Mar 17, 2019 · Rolling opa1642, opa1612, muses8920, 2xopa627bp, lme49720na, opa2134. ah so much other untested opa's 1678 still on my list ina1620. My favorites at the moment opa1642 and this one opa1656. Maybe slightly less extended but so so sweet. It appears that the OPA1611/2 have a lower noise voltage, wider bandwidth and higher slew rate than the OPA134 and OPA2134's. Thanks in Jan 11, 2016 · Yes sir. ad827：延伸非常好，解析力高，高頻華麗，中頻純厚，低頻下潛和力度都不錯，音場向前後左右拓展，有了凹凸感（這一點比其它運放強），速度快，動態好，感覺很大氣，初換上此運放後確實有讓人為之一振的感覺。 May 19, 2017 · maybe modern production 3886 are all above average? the designs seem to take the 'typical' GBW spec as the effective minimum My guesstimate puts the safe with production variation margin local closed loop gain corner as low as 100kHz for LM3886 with a greater than 4:1 range designing for stable extra loop gain from the nice input op amp really doesn't give much 20 kHz added safe composite loop . That seemed like a reasonable target for the supply current of the OPA1656 as well. The soundstage is the only good part, it's the wider due to the bass boost and upper midrange scoop. Hi Team, My customer wants to Dec 11, 2019 · It's a killer OpAmp, and better suited to non-inverting buffer duties than the OPA1612/2211 Low- and Mid-Frequency Test Signals for Evaluation of Room Modes // Measurements: ESS Hump revisited // Humpify -- apply "ESS hump"-style distortions to audio files by OP-amp by song Jump table ↓* VOCAL CLASSIC POPSMUSES03 0:42~ 1:42~ 2:43~ Apr 6, 2020 · The OPA2134 is very ordinary, I consider it a side step to the NE5532. Normal audio can use the cheaper OPA2134. Products Precision op amps (Vos<1mV) INA1620 — High-fidelity audio operational amplifier with integrated thin-film resistors and EMI filtering OPA130 — Single, 1-MHz, 20-pA bias current, 530-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA131 — Single, 4-MHz, 50-pA bias current, 750-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA140 — Single-channel, 11-MHz, low-noise 36-V JFET precision operational May 23, 2018 · What are your thoughts on OPA1622 vs OPA1612? Last edited: Sep 18, 2019. Member. Can anyone suggest drop-in replacements to OPA2134? I'm looking for a natural, transparent sound vs colored. Mar 17, 2019 · 3. The completely docile op amps are the OPA2604, the OPA627, the OPA2107, the LM4562/LME49720 and the OPA2134. Don't let power supply current limitations get in the way of performance. Currently, I require opamps in the DIP package. OPAx134 High-Performance, SoundPlus™ Audio Operational Amplifiers. 4kHz bandwidth Here we see that the LM4562, LM833, LM49720 and OPA2134 all have the same level of performance with the NJM2742 having the worst performance of the bunch and the LT1352 being just slightly worse. Jan 10, 2016 · He talked to me about OPA1611's versus OPA134's as well as the OPA1612's versus OPA2134's. ••• Part Number: OPA1656 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2134, OPA2604 The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. Any futher recommendations? my favs 1642/1656, 1612, lme49720na 2xopa627bp, ••• Jun 18, 2019 · Hello everyone, I have the DAC Emotiva XDA-1 preamp with the DAC Analog Devices AD1955 and Burr Brown OPA-2134 op-amps, I want to update to the Burson Audio Play with the DAC: ESS Technology SABRE32 / ESS9018 and NE5532 X 3, NE554 X 2 op-amps, would it be a good update to the Burson Audio? thank you very much to all. It was recently re-capped and all new guts put in . I also refurbish large format recording consoles. It is solid, sturdy with an aluminum casing at the top. Eric Mo Intellectual 775 points Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1656, OPA134. - Représentation légèrement plus plate que, par exemple, OPA2134 - Une représentation quelque peu artificielle Même si l'OPA2134 est moins équilibré, il joue de manière beaucoup plus musicale et réaliste et reste donc ma recommandation. com SBOS450C –JULY 2009–REVISED AUGUST 2014 5 Pin Configuration and Functions D Package OPA1611, SOIC-8 D Package (Top View) OPA1612, SOIC-8 (Top View) DRG Package OPA1612, SON-8 (Top View) (1) NC denotes no internal connection. Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. The OPA2134 is more a better replacement for the TL072 when you need a FET type. The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. The outcome was no great surprise but the noise character of the OPA1612, which was exaggerated due to the current noise and inductive source impedance, was still clean OPA1611, OPA1612 www. Pin can be left floating or connected to any voltage between (V–) and (V+). 5V to ±18V • Single Sep 15, 2018 · "OPA1612 is better than OPA2134. Which of the two mentioned OP Amps (OPA1612 or OPA1656) is the better one, in a scientific point of view. Two cases were evalutated – in a May 29, 2021 · With the Burson V5i-D in my collection now, I have four sets of OPAMPs for my xDuoo XD05 Bal, OPA1612 stock OPAMP, JRC 5532D stock replacement OPAMP, OPA2134(purchased aftermarket), Burson V5i-D. ナチュラルビューティー。脚色がほとんどない、いわば素肌美人である。音の抜けが良く、ジャンルを問わず使える感じ。超高域の解放感はもう一歩か。でも、充分リファレンス用途までいける。単価も音質の割に破格と言っていいだろう。 Jun 13, 2016 · ポータブルアンプのオペアンプ、オペレーションアンプの交換の実験です。なかなかオペアンプの聴き比べは手間がかかるもの、今回は安価な価格帯のオペアンプから、様々な聴き比べをしていきます。 I found that OPA1612 was in the ultimate soundplus collection that's why i have change for it. At the risk of immediately coming across as exaggerated and/or hyped -- the "battle" was simply an epic slaughter! May 24, 2015 · If you can use a bipolar OP, the NE5532 is usually the better choice than a JFET OPA2132 / OPA2134. While it still has some treble sparkle, It isn't enough to save its sound of complete mudyness and lack of detail. Nov 9, 2012 · Muses02 vs BB OPA2134 in Topping A30 (single-ended to differential buffer) Rig includes: Topping A30 and D30, HD600s (vintage 2017) with HD650 (genuine Sennheiser replacement part) 3m cable (1. the best sounding is OPA1612 ,not for driving headphones -low output current drive ,3ma current consumption. " May 15, 2022 · Buggle2 Riaa board. The other OPA2134 is for I/V convert. It has the most stable input capacitance vs. Jul 4, 2009 · OK i've been testing the OPA2227, OPA2228, OPA2134, OPA1612, and the Muses 02. May 9, 2023 · Hello together, i want to put one of the mentioned OP Amps in my amp. It has OPA2604 buffer amps that many have replaced with dual OPA627BP's with good results. 000015% at 1 kHz. La traduction française vient de Google. Though we did not test it before but we believe OPA1612 is a better choice. 魅族mx4pro运放芯片用的是1612，而xplay 3s用2604，不知道魅族能不能比vivo更屌呢？ 貌似老外们觉得2604比较好有助攻的么 OPA1612 与 OPA2604 对比？ พวก opa627 opa2134 muse01/02 muses8820 muses8920 lme49720 ne5532/34 OPA1612 VS MUSE02 ทั้งคู่เป็น BiPolar เหมือนกัน Also compared the OPA1612 to an NJM2068 and OPA2134 in a moving magnet preamp and it was, as expected due to higher current noise, noisier than the BJT '2068 and FET '2134. Feb 11, 2021 · I'll look at it if you know of one amp using OPA1612 sounding audibly better than another amp using cheaper op amp in objective listening comparison. Anyway, OPA2134 is pleasure sounding Op-Amp. May 2, 2020 · opa2134系列是超低失真，低噪声运算放大器，为音频应用完全指定。本文介绍了opa2134引脚及特性，其次介绍了opa2134封装信息与绝对最大额定值，最后介绍了三款opa2134的应用电路。 OPA165x Ultra-Low-Noise, Low-Distortion, FET-Input, Burr-Brown™ Audio Operational Amplifiers 1 Features • Ultra-low noise: – Voltage noise: 2. How are LME49860, LME49720 etc? Are they drop-in Jun 20, 2001 · Neruda: You want Treble, More Treble than you are used to then use an AD-823 for the gain Opamp and the LM-6172,s as the Output Buffer. Mar 22, 2022 · OPA1612 (soic on dil adapter board), bi-polar from input to output, again a very good opamp, which to me "sounds more balanced" top to bottom than the LME, it is just as dynamic, but just a little less obvious in the bass leading edge because the mid-range seems a little more fleshed out rich and full bodied, highs are just as good as the LME. Nov 25, 2015 · Im interested in op amp rolling for my amp since its not expensive to try out and I was surprised to find a lot of variation between them, the amp has a very simple circuit so my results could be more siginificant than with other amps. These two OP amp has great impact on performance so we don't want our users to change it. The OPA-2132 & OPA-2134 sound Dull and Vailed to me. OPA2134 and NE5532 both have power supply currents of about 4mA per channel, and have been widely adopted in the market (understatement). I no nothing about this. but I'm not a big fan of personally - though mostly transparent and decent performance I find it somehow sounds "sterile" and probably responsible for turning a good few to tube amps. i tryed lme49722 opa2134 and opa1612 , --. I don't care about listening tests or something else, just want to use the technical better one in my amp. JohnYang1997 Nov 8, 2006 · OPA2134 and OPA2604 are very close in data. It sounds swell but I have a set of the higher performance LMA49720NA DIP-8 opamps here on my desk and I'm wondering if they're plug-in compatible. But I really like the FET's in that position. OPA1612 sounds better than any transistor preamp I've ever heard and better then my own 6N6P 2 case -no barrels hold- 36kg monster preamp with a 100% double blind test win rate. Regrettably, but not surprisingly, no evidence is given to back up this assertion. ti. The OPA 627 is well over price and is bass heavy and it’s not worth the price you pay for it The OPA1612 and OPA827 are much better than any of these but these are SOIC and you’ll need an adapter with experience soldering skills. Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1612, OPA1642, RC4136 I use these amplifiers for pro audio. Dec 6, 2018 · I would recommend OPA2134 or OPA134 and if you have money the OPA627 or OPA637. Feb 11, 2021 · The OPA2134 opamp The OPA2134 is a Burr-Brown product, the dual version of the OPA134. ※在庫数欄の表記が『おひとり様 点まで』となっている商品は、現時点で、おひとり様（1団体様）あたりのご提供数量を表記の数量へ制限させていただいている商品です。 Jan 6, 2010 · I have an Onix XCD-99 which is basically a Music Hall CD-25. I can't put it much differently. Unfortunatly with the new OPA1612 I have obtained a lot of noise on the output channel. I have a 1988 carver stereo per-amplifier. Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1678, OPA1611, OPA1602, OPA1642. Products Precision op amps (Vos<1mV) INA1620 — High-fidelity audio operational amplifier with integrated thin-film resistors and EMI filtering OPA130 — Single, 1-MHz, 20-pA bias current, 530-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA131 — Single, 4-MHz, 50-pA bias current, 750-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA140 — Single-channel, 11-MHz, low-noise 36-V JFET precision operational Aug 24, 2018 · THD+N Ratio vs Measured Level / Inverting 6dB Gain / 100k load / 22. Now they seems to have changed again to opa1612 in many places - maybe a suggestion to try ? I have tried ne5532, opa2604, lm4562 and opa1612 and I prefered LM 4562 in both Aiyima a07 and the tpa3251-based Aiyima a04. . Apr 1, 2012 · Howdy. Sep 15, 2018 · "OPA1612 is better than OPA2134. Nov 24, 2018 · I hate such ugly clipping behavior(any real opamp of serious manufacturers have an ideal clipping without screeching) and one that fact is enough to me to consider that chip junk. The OPAx132 is the slightly better version for DC critical applications. Using hd600s and 400is to test them Ive compared the Nov 30, 2021 · OPA2134: OPA2134 VS OPA1656. I was wondering if the OPA2604's could be replace with a dual opamp like the OPA1612 with similar or hopefully better results than the OPA627's Mar 7, 2019 · Previously i used OPA2134 Op-Amps in my DIY project and CD/DVD modification and after abou year ago i start to use OPA1612. Will be trying these in gain stage: OPA1611, ADA4610-1, OPA189 Nov 19, 2015 · OPA2134 - another workhorse, very tolerant of poor circuits, etc. Tested a lot of OP, including LME49720, OPA1612, OPA1642, MUSES8920 and MUSES8820. I should have done my research a bit better because because I overlooked OPA1612 which is purported to have superior performance compared to LM4562. Feb 28, 2021 · The LM833 was released way more than 20 years ago, and if memory serves, OPA2134 was released around the year 2000, and LM4562 around 2006. OPA2134 costs an arm and a leg. OPA2604 is a little bit faster. Since i couldnt find an opa2134, i just use tl072 and the likes for our projects I am just curious how opa2134's output performance. Jul 4, 2009 · For I/V: OPA1692 is best, compared to - OPA1612, OPA2192, OPA2209, OPA1652, NE5532, LME9720, OPA1622, OPA1602, OPA1662 For LP: OPA1692 for now, I have good expectations from OPA2209 but they are out of stock. 高音質電源改善アクセサリーを中心に、音響を中心に電気で世の中に貢献しています。 Jan 28, 2018 · I had the chance to gather up a selection of opamps from my parts bin, including BB OPA2604, OPA637, AD823, LME49860, JR4556, Muses8820 and 8920, and compare them against each other along with a Burson V6 Classic (thanks to them for sending me an evaluation). J'espère que ça a du sens. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. Those are fine. It is difficult to say which one is better. 1 Features. OPA2604 is one of the few op-amps having +24 -24 max supply voltage. The manufacturer claims it has superior sound quality, due to its JFET input stage. The different players sounded different. One other very noteworthy difference is the Vivid has a strong attack, but loses a bit on the decay so sustain is better on the SS360x. I have a phono preamp board with three socketed DIP-8 OPA2134 in it. #2. Goggle bill d mod carver c-1. A quick snapshot of the OPA1656 performance specs: Jun 7, 2016 · OPA1612 1612 will sound warmer, thicker, mellower and darker with most headphones and IEMs. ^^' The OPA1611 (single) and OPA1612 (dual) bipolar-input operational amplifiers achieve very low 1. When we developed the OPA1656, this was also a major design target for us, and the designer and myself spent quite awhile in the lab with previous CMOS audio op amps (specifically OPA1652 and OPA1688) hunting for sources of input capacitance variation. opa2134. common mode voltage that I've measured on any op amp. " Products Precision op amps (Vos<1mV) INA1620 — High-fidelity audio operational amplifier with integrated thin-film resistors and EMI filtering OPA130 — Single, 1-MHz, 20-pA bias current, 530-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA131 — Single, 4-MHz, 50-pA bias current, 750-µA power, FET operational amplifier OPA140 — Single-channel, 11-MHz, low-noise 36-V JFET precision operational We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. According to the datasheets for both Apr 21, 2019 · vs Burson V6 Vivid The V6 Vivid has a faster attack than the classic, but still not quite as fast as the SS360x which allows the SS360x to wring out just slightly more detail than the Vivids. A question for opamp gurus. uhfifgw tni dmjif smyeo vcbflc oritmwiho rlr irbcz irbmg koupfhi